<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Digital Sandwich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalsandwich.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalsandwich.com</link>
	<description>Forever Proving I am a Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHPUnit Database Extension (DBUnit Port) by Puru</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/63-phpunit-database-extension-dbunit-port.html#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Puru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=63#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>Thanks for great tutorial.

I&#039;ve two question. 
1.  I&#039;m using XMLDataset and it works fine. But is there a way if I want to use getDataSet() method to use more than one xml files. For example, I&#039;ve two xml files with has data eg; table1.xml and table2.xml. I&#039;ve a test which uses both data(table1.xml and table2.xml). Rather than creating another xml file table1_table2.xml and use it within datasource, I want to use existing 2 datasources.  It would be great to know if this is possible.
 
2.  I was trying to use return $this-&gt;getOperations()-&gt;TRUNCATE() method. Is anyone been able to make it work ? I&#039;m using phpunit 3.6 Suggestion would be great. 

Thanks
P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for great tutorial.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve two question.<br />
1.  I&#8217;m using XMLDataset and it works fine. But is there a way if I want to use getDataSet() method to use more than one xml files. For example, I&#8217;ve two xml files with has data eg; table1.xml and table2.xml. I&#8217;ve a test which uses both data(table1.xml and table2.xml). Rather than creating another xml file table1_table2.xml and use it within datasource, I want to use existing 2 datasources.  It would be great to know if this is possible.</p>
<p>2.  I was trying to use return $this-&gt;getOperations()-&gt;TRUNCATE() method. Is anyone been able to make it work ? I&#8217;m using phpunit 3.6 Suggestion would be great. </p>
<p>Thanks<br />
P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Phake Mocking Framework by Erin</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/84-introducing-phake-mocking-framework.html#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=84#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Great work on Phake! I&#039;d really love to see it become the de-facto standard, as it just makes a lot more sense, compared to the way that PHPUnit&#039;s mocks work.

One thing that&#039;s not mentioned as a benefit over PHPUnit, that I love, is the ability to use identicalTo() when verifying arguments to a method call. There&#039;s currently a limitation in PHPUnit&#039;s mocking system that prevents this, and it just feels right to be able to do so without filthy hax.

Thanks again :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work on Phake! I&#8217;d really love to see it become the de-facto standard, as it just makes a lot more sense, compared to the way that PHPUnit&#8217;s mocks work.</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s not mentioned as a benefit over PHPUnit, that I love, is the ability to use identicalTo() when verifying arguments to a method call. There&#8217;s currently a limitation in PHPUnit&#8217;s mocking system that prevents this, and it just feels right to be able to do so without filthy hax.</p>
<p>Thanks again <img src='http://digitalsandwich.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Hate Singletons by syndrael</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/77-why-i-hate-singletons.html#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>syndrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=77#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>May be a great article.. but i can&#039;t see both snippet codes.. on FF3.6.17 and Chromium 14.
Best regards
S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be a great article.. but i can&#8217;t see both snippet codes.. on FF3.6.17 and Chromium 14.<br />
Best regards<br />
S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Phake Mocking Framework by WC</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/84-introducing-phake-mocking-framework.html#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>WC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=84#comment-983</guid>
		<description>When setting the return value, is there a way to specify a callback function instead?  I don&#039;t use that often with PHPUnit, but when I do, it&#039;s quite necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When setting the return value, is there a way to specify a callback function instead?  I don&#8217;t use that often with PHPUnit, but when I do, it&#8217;s quite necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2008 DC PHP Conference &#8211; Advanced PHPUnit Testing by Jonathon Hill</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/74-2008-dc-php-conference-advanced-phpunit-testing.html#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=74#comment-876</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, looks like a great presentation but there are a few things I don&#039;t quite get just by looking at your slides. Do you have a video version of this presentation, or would you be willing to present it again via Skype? There are three of us that are wanting to get up to snuff on unit testing with PHPUnit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, looks like a great presentation but there are a few things I don&#8217;t quite get just by looking at your slides. Do you have a video version of this presentation, or would you be willing to present it again via Skype? There are three of us that are wanting to get up to snuff on unit testing with PHPUnit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Phake Mocking Framework by Mockery 0.7.1 Released &#8211; It&#8217;s a Test Double Framework &#124; Pádraic Brady</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/84-introducing-phake-mocking-framework.html#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Mockery 0.7.1 Released &#8211; It&#8217;s a Test Double Framework &#124; Pádraic Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=84#comment-866</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m happy to say that Mockery is not the only alternative that has emerged. Mike Lively has recently being working on Phake, a PHP Mocking Framework. That means you all have two choices which are entirely independent of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m happy to say that Mockery is not the only alternative that has emerged. Mike Lively has recently being working on Phake, a PHP Mocking Framework. That means you all have two choices which are entirely independent of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improved PHPUnit Filters by Testing datetimes with phpunit datasets - SitePoint Forums</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/78-improved-phpunit-filters.html#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Testing datetimes with phpunit datasets - SitePoint Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=78#comment-786</guid>
		<description>[...]  There&#039;s also a filter, which I poked the author about for quite some time. You can read more here: Improved PHPUnit Filters &#124; Digital Sandwich  The code becomes monstrous with all those classes in your test methods. I basically extend [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  There&#039;s also a filter, which I poked the author about for quite some time. You can read more here: Improved PHPUnit Filters | Digital Sandwich  The code becomes monstrous with all those classes in your test methods. I basically extend [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PHPUnit Database Extension (DBUnit Port) by Ryan</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/63-phpunit-database-extension-dbunit-port.html#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=63#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Great example.  I used this to get myself going.  The manual seems to be lacking in examples.  Perhaps this example should be included in the manual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great example.  I used this to get myself going.  The manual seems to be lacking in examples.  Perhaps this example should be included in the manual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Phake Mocking Framework by Padraic Brady</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/84-introducing-phake-mocking-framework.html#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Padraic Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=84#comment-541</guid>
		<description>2011: Year Of The Mock Object ;)

Yes, I am the one developing Mockery. As you noted above, there are a lot of preferences around mocking, a lot of approaches, and a lot of strategies to achieve it. I think it&#039;s great to see another library make an appearance. While both are technically sound, it finally puts on the horizon the likelihood that PHPers can avail of several mocking/stubbing/spying options depending on their tastes and needs or even familiarity with options across other languages. Which would finally put us on an even footing with Ruby/Java/Python when it comes to mock objects. Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011: Year Of The Mock Object <img src='http://digitalsandwich.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes, I am the one developing Mockery. As you noted above, there are a lot of preferences around mocking, a lot of approaches, and a lot of strategies to achieve it. I think it&#8217;s great to see another library make an appearance. While both are technically sound, it finally puts on the horizon the likelihood that PHPers can avail of several mocking/stubbing/spying options depending on their tastes and needs or even familiarity with options across other languages. Which would finally put us on an even footing with Ruby/Java/Python when it comes to mock objects. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing Phake Mocking Framework by Mike Lively</title>
		<link>http://digitalsandwich.com/archives/84-introducing-phake-mocking-framework.html#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lively</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsandwich.com/?p=84#comment-531</guid>
		<description>I have looked at the api but it has some of the same methodology and concepts behind it that I don&#039;t really care for. There is nothing technically wrong with it, just a matter of preference. The biggest one being that I prefer to verify the calls to mocks after the test is exercised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have looked at the api but it has some of the same methodology and concepts behind it that I don&#8217;t really care for. There is nothing technically wrong with it, just a matter of preference. The biggest one being that I prefer to verify the calls to mocks after the test is exercised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

